Feminist Political ecology:(FPE)

 FPE: An interdisciplinary framework examining how gender, environment, and power intersect.

Origin: Since the 1990s, influenced by political ecology and feminist theory.

Examples include:

Global North (Western communities):

 Analyzing climate activism in Europe about how women's role in climate policies is often neglected.

Global South (Asia, India):

Vandana Shiva's ecofeminism critiques corporate control of seeds, highlighting women's knowledge of traditional ecology.


Key thinkers include:

 

Rocheleau

Environmental knowledge and practices are gendered, shaped by individuals' community roles and interactions.
 She advocates for integrating gender analysis into environmental research to understand the differentiated impacts of ecological changes on men and women.

 




Thomas Slayter 


focuses on the political dimensions of resource access, highlighting how gendered power relations influence environmental decision-making. 
She calls for critically examining how policies and practices affect men and women differently, advocating for more inclusive and equitable approaches.





 Wangri 

 contributes to understanding the intersection of gender, environment, and development, emphasizing the need to consider local contexts in environmental governance. 

She supports collaborative methodologies that incorporate women's experiences and knowledge in shaping sustainable environmental policies.



Critiques to environmental science:

Advocacy for Situated Knowledge: Haraway promotes the concept of "situated knowledge," emphasizing that all knowledge is produced from specific perspectives shaped by social, cultural, and historical contexts. She argues that recognizing the situatedness of knowledge can lead to more inclusive and equitable scientific practices.

For example, cultivating practices in Bhutan may not be the same as in other countries. 

FPE critiques:

1} Universalist Environmental Science

Critique: Universalist environmental science often assumes that ecological principles and solutions are universally applicable, disregarding cultural, social, and local contexts. This approach can marginalize indigenous knowledge systems and local practices, leading to solutions that may not be effective or appropriate for all communities.

2} Masculinist Environmental Science

Critique: Masculinist environmental science is characterized by a focus on technological solutions and a dominance of male perspectives in environmental decision-making. This can lead to an overemphasis on engineering approaches while undervaluing care-based and community-centered strategies.

Example: Zimbabwe (southern Africa)

Women collect edible wild plants to feed their families during food shortages, as they have greater knowledge about plants; however, they are marginalized in databases.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feminist and Indigenous Political Ecology

Image
Gender + Indigenous Knowledge + Power Dynamics in Agriculture and Food Security.   Feminist and Indigenous political ecology frameworks highlight the intricate connections between gender, indigenous knowledge, and agriculture and food security power dynamics.  In Bhutan, while women play a significant role in agriculture, t raditional patriarchal norms often marginalize their contributions and limit their access to resources and decision-making processes, and recognize them as unpaid labor.  Examples include limited access to agricultural inputs, credit, and land ownership.  Land rights struggles : It explores conflicts over indigenous territories where industrial agriculture often displaces native stewardship. Those indigenous communities often include women, who share an emotional connection with their native lands, displacing their culture, ecological practices, and land ownership.  Additionally, societal norms and religious beliefs can perpetuate the no...
Read more

Political Ecology

Image
This theory or approach primarily helps us understand the environment through the lens of social, economic, and, most importantly, political factors. It proposes that not all environmental change happens naturally; politics also shapes the environment by framing policies, deciding the distribution of resources, and controlling it.  Example: Waste: Political factors—rules of the state on the production of waste.                            Economics: Production of industrial waste with a capitalist motive.                            Social: Daily production of waste in households due to consumption.  Politics includes different power dynamics, which get to decide who owns what, what resources they get, and how much they should consume. In countries like Bhutan, resources like water for fieldwork are often distributed unequally; either a pers...
Read more